You don't have to memorize the rule — it falls right out of the tangent line you already know from differential calculus.
The grey curve is the true solution; the pink staircase is Euler's approximation, each step a straight tangent segment. Drag the step size down and watch the staircase snap onto the curve; drag it up and watch it drift, with the error at each step marked. Hit walk it to take the steps one at a time.
This is the calculation the exam asks for. In Show me mode, reveal the steps one at a time; switch to Test me to type each value yourself and get checked — with the worked step shown if you miss.
| Step | The arithmetic |
|---|
From a point, take the slope the equation gives, multiply by the step, and add it on. Then move x forward by h and repeat.
Each step is one use of local linear approximation — the same tangent-line idea from derivatives, applied over and over.
Halving the step size roughly halves the error — but doubles the number of steps. Accuracy and work pull in opposite directions.
Euler rides the tangents, so the way the curve bends decides the miss: concave up it falls short, concave down it overshoots.
Six checks on the method — running the steps, reading the error, and the concavity reasoning the exam loves to ask about. Try each before revealing the answer.
Six fast multiple-choice checks across the whole lesson. Pick an answer to see whether it's right and why — then work through all six.
Each step uses the slope at the start of the interval, f(xₙ, yₙ) — not f(xₙ₊₁, yₙ₊₁). Plug in the values you're standing on, then step.
Every row moves x forward by h as well as updating y. Skip the x update and the next slope is evaluated at the wrong place.
The table is short but unforgiving — one wrong slope or a dropped minus sign corrupts every row after it. Carry numbers carefully, row to row.
Smaller steps cut the error, but they also mean more steps, more arithmetic, and more rounding. There's always a tradeoff.
Euler gives an approximation. Unless told otherwise, don't treat the final yₙ as the exact value of the solution.
It's not random: concave-up solutions are underestimated, concave-down are overestimated. Check the concavity (often the sign of y″) to decide.